Σελίδες για το θέμα: < [1 2 3 4 5 6 7] > | Flagging KudoZ answers - what's your choice? Αποστολέας σε συζήτηση: Attila Piróth
| Additional comment on the Survey | Mar 27, 2009 |
Question #8 is faulty: it should have one more choice: "I do not want to use tracking". Unless this answer is added, people who answered "No" to Question 2 would not be able to select a logical answer for Question 8.
Thanks
Katalin | | |
Preferred solution: #1.
Also acceptable: #2.
Not acceptable: #3 and #4.
Katalin (KudoZ 3705, with KudoZ Mod experience) | | | Kristina Kolic Κροατία Local time: 10:09 Αγγλικά σε Κροατικά + ... SITE LOCALIZER
First choice: #4 (info already available & accessible via profiles, and since it is also possible to track KudoZ questions, l do not see any privacy or other issue)
Also acceptable: #3
Not acceptable: #1 and #2
PRO-level points: 2118 | | | Giuliana Buscaglione Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες Αμερικής Local time: 01:09 Μέλος από 2001 Γερμανικά σε Ιταλικά + ... right, Katalin | Mar 27, 2009 |
Hi Katalin,
Katalin wrote:
Question #8 is faulty: it should have one more choice: "I do not want to use tracking". Unless this answer is added, people who answered "No" to Question 2 would not be able to select a logical answer for Question 8.
Agree, having no other choice to clearly state that I have no wish to use any tracking, I have added it in the free text box.
Giuliana | |
|
|
Giuliana Buscaglione wrote:
Hi Katalin,
Katalin wrote:
Question #8 is faulty: it should have one more choice: "I do not want to use tracking". Unless this answer is added, people who answered "No" to Question 2 would not be able to select a logical answer for Question 8.
Agree, having no other choice to clearly state that I have no wish to use any tracking, I have added it in the free text box.
Giuliana
I agree with Katalin. I left question 8 unanswered because there was no answer I could give and like Giuliana, I also stated in the text box that I was not interested in tracking anyone or in being tracked. | | | Yolanda Broad Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες Αμερικής Local time: 04:09 Μέλος από 2000 Γαλλικά σε Αγγλικά + ... ΣΥΝΤΟΝΙΣΤΗΣ Privacy is a paramount value on ProZ.com | Mar 27, 2009 |
Let's not do anything to lessen the protection we enjoy on this Site.
Preferences:
#1 Scrap it from public use
#2 is also acceptable (but I don't see much point to it)
I am categorically opposed to #3 and #4.
(Number of KudoZ points: 4161) | | | Yolanda Broad Ηνωμένες Πολιτείες Αμερικής Local time: 04:09 Μέλος από 2000 Γαλλικά σε Αγγλικά + ... ΣΥΝΤΟΝΙΣΤΗΣ I can't find Henry's poll. ??? | Mar 27, 2009 |
Since I've been answering KudoZ questions since their inception, I'm puzzled that I can't locate that poll. Has it disappeared again already?
Henry D wrote:
Thanks for posting, Attila.
To gather additional data, I also posted a survey. It will appear on the home page to people who have KudoZ points. (I wanted to get feedback specifically from people who answer KudoZ questions.) I invite those who have posted here (and have KudoZ points) to complete it.
I'll post the results here in a few days. | | | Attila Piróth Γαλλία Local time: 10:09 Μέλος Αγγλικά σε Ουγγαρέζικα + ... ΞΕΚΙΝΗΣΕ ΤΟ ΘΕΜΑ
|
|
Thanks, Attila | Mar 27, 2009 |
Attila Piróth wrote:
Hi folks,
Thanks for the valuable comments about the survey. I have just opened a new thread for commenting on the survey: http://www.proz.com/forum/kudoz/131411-comments_on_the_survey_on_flagging_answerers_feature.html
Related threads start to proliferate, nonetheless it might, in the long run, be advantageous to separate the general discussion from the choice between the proposed solutions and from the survey feedback. This will allow us to stay on topic more easily.
Thanks for the feedback on the survey, folks. I'll make the change.
As for the new thread you opened up, no offense, Attila, but I would not like to encourage people to discuss the survey while it is underway, for obvious reasons.
If anyone has any additional feedback on the survey, please submit it via a support ticket. | | | Aniello Scognamiglio (X) Γερμανία Local time: 10:09 Αγγλικά σε Γερμανικά + ... The results of the survey are predictable | Mar 27, 2009 |
While I appreciate the idea of posting a survey (I already completed it to my dissatisfaction), most of the questions lack objectivity (impartiality), e.g. "6. Assuming the feature is not removed, would you like to be informed of the fact that someone is tracking your answers?" should be followed by a question such as "6. Assuming the feature is removed... That would give participants a real choice.
The subjective type of questions (by the way, the survey is not detail... See more While I appreciate the idea of posting a survey (I already completed it to my dissatisfaction), most of the questions lack objectivity (impartiality), e.g. "6. Assuming the feature is not removed, would you like to be informed of the fact that someone is tracking your answers?" should be followed by a question such as "6. Assuming the feature is removed... That would give participants a real choice.
The subjective type of questions (by the way, the survey is not detailed enough to be representative) makes me think that a decision has already been taken (i.e. not to remove the flagging feature at all) behind the scenes. Asking twice "Assuming the feature is not removed..." indicates that removing the feature is almost excluded.
I understand that your developers spent much time on implementing this feature, but how many people did you ask prior to implementing it?
I am categorically opposed to the violation of (my) privacy! ▲ Collapse | | | Thanks, italengger, but please do not discuss the survey while it is underway | Mar 27, 2009 |
italengger wrote:
While I appreciate the idea of posting a survey (I already completed it to my dissatisfaction), most of the questions lack objectivity (impartiality), e.g. "6. Assuming the feature is not removed, would you like to be informed of the fact that someone is tracking your answers?" should be followed by a question such as "6. Assuming the feature is removed... That would give participants a real choice.
The subjective type of questions (by the way, the survey is not detailed enough to be representative) makes me think that a decision has already been taken (i.e. not to remove the flagging feature at all) behind the scenes. Asking twice "Assuming the feature is not removed..." indicates that removing the feature is almost excluded.
Thank you for taking the time to complete the survey. I would kindly ask that you not discuss the survey while it is underway, as that would tend to influence the outcome. | | | We can get rid of it -- what I am trying to determine is whether or not anything can be retained | Mar 27, 2009 |
italengger wrote:
I understand that your developers spent much time on implementing this feature, but how many people did you ask prior to implementing it?
Actually, not so much time. Getting rid of it is a definite option. (Even if a lot of time had been spent on it, getting rid of it would be an option.)
Ideally, what is valuable can be retained, while what is problematic or objectionable can be corrected. This is in line with part of the site's guiding principles, namely that "Choice is paramount". Which is to say, it is generally a goal to give each user the maximum degree of control over his/her workplace experience.
To see the guiding principles, click About in the main menu, and then "Guiding principles" on the left. | |
|
|
texjax DDS PhD Local time: 04:09 Μέλος από 2006 Αγγλικά σε Ιταλικά + ...
First choice: #0 (removing the feature)
Also acceptable: #0
Not acceptable: #1, #2, #3, #4
(Number of Pro-level KudoZ points: 4102)
[Edited at 2009-03-27 13:55 GMT] | | | Özden Arıkan Γερμανία Local time: 10:09 Αγγλικά σε Τουρκικά + ...
First choice: #1 (scrap it)
Also acceptable: #2 (add opt-in)
Not acceptable: #3 and #4 (add opt-out or keep it unchanged)
(Pro points 1396)
[Edited at 2009-03-27 13:44 GMT] | | | What could be asked? :-) | Mar 27, 2009 |
italengger wrote:
....a question such as "6. Assuming the feature is removed... That would give participants a real choice.
What could one realistically ask about a feature that would, under the question's starting hypothesis, not exist?
I am categorically opposed to the violation of (my) privacy!
Yeah, I keep hearing this. Unless I am missing something, the information concerned - kudoz answers and comments - is already in the public domain. Anyone who wants to can see it already.
I could very well be looking at certain profiles regularly, and/or receiving emails about questions in certain people's fields, and/ore refreshing the questions list every 15 minutes, simply to see if certain people have said anything new or interesting.
All that is being added at this stage is easier access to the same information. Or have I missed something? | | | Σελίδες για το θέμα: < [1 2 3 4 5 6 7] > | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » Flagging KudoZ answers - what's your choice? Wordfast Pro | Translation Memory Software for Any Platform
Exclusive discount for ProZ.com users!
Save over 13% when purchasing Wordfast Pro through ProZ.com. Wordfast is the world's #1 provider of platform-independent Translation Memory software. Consistently ranked the most user-friendly and highest value
Buy now! » |
| CafeTran Espresso | You've never met a CAT tool this clever!
Translate faster & easier, using a sophisticated CAT tool built by a translator / developer.
Accept jobs from clients who use Trados, MemoQ, Wordfast & major CAT tools.
Download and start using CafeTran Espresso -- for free
Buy now! » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |